unclassifiable satement

General scientific issues regarding ROMS

Moderators: arango, robertson

Post Reply
Message
Author
wrh
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: zhejiang ocean university

unclassifiable satement

#1 Unread post by wrh »

could you tell me how to correct it?
v3dbc_im.f90:166.8:

vg(i,j,k,nstp)=v(i,j,k,nstp)-BOUNDARY(ng)%v_south(i,k)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
v3dbc_im.f90:167.3:

vg(i,j,k,nout)=v(i,j,k,nout)-BOUNDARY(ng)%v_south(i,k)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
make: *** [/home/wrh/model/project/ecsn/Build/v3dbc_im.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
u3dbc_im.f90:219.8:

ug(i,j,k,nstp)=u(i,j,k,nstp)-BOUNDARY(ng)%u_south(i,k)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
u3dbc_im.f90:220.3:

ug(i,j,k,nout)=u(i,j,k,nout)-BOUNDARY(ng)%u_south(i,k)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
t3dbc_im.f90:226.6:

tg(i,j,k,nstp,itrc)=t(i,j,k,nstp,itrc)- &
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
t3dbc_im.f90:228.1:

User avatar
arango
Site Admin
Posts: 1368
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: DMCS, Rutgers University
Contact:

Re: unclassifiable satement

#2 Unread post by arango »

Well, it very simple ug(i,j,k,nstp), vg(i,j,k,nstp), tg(i,j,k,nstp,itrc) are not ROMS variables in the boundary condition routines mentioned in error message. If you check the distributed code, you will find out that such variables are not used in the boundary condition routines. Why did you modified the original code? The variables uG, vG, and tG are used for the forward trajectory in the adjoint-based algorithms. You should not make such changes :!:

Post Reply