Search found 68 matches
- Sat May 01, 2021 2:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Blow up ( River run off)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17812
Re: Blow up ( River run off)
The explaination in wikiroms is confusing. And the issuse is that if you set the right river_Xposition and river_Eposition. Maybe you can read #5 of this post https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2200 Update: Wilkin reminded me that my answer is problematic. And here is his advice, which is ...
- Tue Dec 08, 2020 3:23 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Energetics
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6444
Re: Energetics
Peida, The shared folder just had things like mexcdf and the seawater routines, which are publicly available. However, I am not supporting that code at all any more and I strongly urge you to write your own from scratch. Cheers, Parker Parker, Thanks, I will take a try. :D Have a good day! Peida
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:58 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Energetics
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6444
Re: Energetics
Reiner, We recently published a paper which gives a method for complete energy budgets in ROMS: MacCready, P., and S. N. Giddings (2016) The Mechanical Energy Budget of a Regional Ocean Model. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 2719–2733, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-16-0086.1. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/J ...
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 6:23 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: run error when applying forcing file
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6506
Re: run error when applying forcing file
From your .h file, I find you use ANA_SMFLUX, but you undefine ANA_SSFLUX and STFLUX. Well, define ana_.. means you use anaytical functions in ROMS/fucntions to calculate this variable. However, it seems that you want to calculate them by Monin-Obukhov similarities method in bulk.F but not anaytical ...
- Thu Feb 27, 2020 2:42 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Run two cases at the same time
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1677
Run two cases at the same time
Hi all,
I want to know that can we run two projects at the same time in ROMS to improve efficiency? How to achieve this?
Thanks
I want to know that can we run two projects at the same time in ROMS to improve efficiency? How to achieve this?
Thanks
- Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:50 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Wave absorption boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4779
Re: Wave absorption boundary condition
Thank you, Hoty:
After some trials, I found I could expand the area to decrease the influence of boundary reflection.
And I use:
After some trials, I found I could expand the area to decrease the influence of boundary reflection.
And I use:
- Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:58 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Wave absorption boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4779
Re: Wave absorption boundary condition
If your barotropic solution is working for you, don't change that. Using Rad alone will not require external fields. You may or may not do better with RADIATION_2D. Just try it and see if it helps. If you want more specific advice, you should probably tell us more about what you are trying to do ...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:03 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Wave absorption boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4779
Re: Wave absorption boundary condition
This is a classic problem with regional ocean models. You can try the radiation boundary conditions instead, if you like. However, what is working for us in practice is using values from a global ocean model on the boundaries to keep things behaving better (if not entirely well). Thanks Kate, I ...
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:21 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Best practices for ROMS bathymetric values
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9594
Re: Best practices for ROMS bathymetric values
After checking more closely, I found that the blowup occurred at a time very close to when a typhoon passed my study area. In my initial simulation, the blowup occurred just a few days after my start time, during which the approaching typhoon already seemed to be influencing the conditions in my ...
- Tue Jan 14, 2020 2:00 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Wave absorption boundary condition
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4779
Wave absorption boundary condition
Hi all, I used OpenFOAM recently and ran a case with wave absorption boundary condition. When I turn to ROMS, I found that they were no wave absorption boundary condition. I don't have open boundary data, and I only want to absorb wave of open boudary and avoid reflection. I tried cha for 2dzeta ...
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 11:55 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Question about SST in WRF-ROMS coupling
- Replies: 7
- Views: 13971
Re: Question about SST in WRF-ROMS coupling
I heard when using ROMS simulated tyhoon process, the over-mixing often happens which results over-cooling. Maybe you can try to adjust parameters in ROMS mixing scheme.
- Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:37 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Best practices for ROMS bathymetric values
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9594
Re: Best practices for ROMS bathymetric values
You don't mention the point or the place model blows up, maybe it helps.
And if you activate WET_DRY. If -100m palce always be dry, or sometimes be wet?
And if you activate WET_DRY. If -100m palce always be dry, or sometimes be wet?
- Tue Dec 31, 2019 2:30 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Add a in ROMS
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2380
Re: Add acceleration in ROMS equations
Thanks for your suggestion, I will have a try.
Peida
Peida
- Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:53 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Add a in ROMS
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2380
Add a in ROMS
Hi all,
I am trying to add a time-varing horizontal acceleration, but I don't find any introduction about control eqution code in wikiROMS, I wonder that if someone have achieved this before and could share that how to deal with the code.
Thanks and look forward to your reply!
I am trying to add a time-varing horizontal acceleration, but I don't find any introduction about control eqution code in wikiROMS, I wonder that if someone have achieved this before and could share that how to deal with the code.
Thanks and look forward to your reply!
- Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: WET_DRY option results in too much land_mask?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2225
Re: WET_DRY option results in too much land_mask?
You are telling the model that it can never have less than 10 m water depth in the "wet" parts. You might try something rather smaller for DCRIT, like 0.5 m. Then you'd have to have 9.5 m of water leaving due to the storm surge before a spot became "dry". Thank you for your reply, Kate! I ...
- Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:19 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: The xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3273
Re: The xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input
Thank you! It's very helpful!wilkin wrote:There is a detailed explanation of the conventions for specifying river sources here in WikiROMS:
https://www.myroms.org/wiki/River_Runof ... _Eposition
- Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:16 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: open boundary for future projection of CMIP6 downscaling
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6242
Re: open boundary for future projection of CMIP6 downscaling
According to rtoste's suggestion, I recreated the initial and boundary files from CMIP for my simulation, then it works well without blow-up problem. Good evening, I have the same question. I wonder that if your inition data and boundary data are from different database, which cause this problem ...
- Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:57 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: WET_DRY option results in too much land_mask?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2225
WET_DRY option results in too much land_mask?
Hello everyone, I am runing a costal area case and I just force it by wind stress.The running time is 16days. I set hmin as 10m and turn on the WET_DRY option( I set WET_DRY parameter as 10m , too). But I don't know why there are too much land mask generated in the last half of my calculation time ...
- Tue Sep 17, 2019 7:19 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: I/O syntax error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2807
Re: I/O syntax error
Maybe some variables are not consistent in your input files(.in file and some input nc files). You can try CPP options kate told you, I think it works well
- Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:01 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: DIAG speed trouble / gridbuilder
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3481
Re: DIAG speed trouble / gridbuilder
With a minimum grid cell size of ~4 km you should be well within CFL stability with such a small time step, so that's not your problem. The log indicates a 3rd record was written to the restart file on blow-up, so you should plot what's in there and look for a location that is causes trouble. It ...
- Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:47 am
- Forum: ROMS Tools and Techniques
- Topic: How to use the matlab script for pre- &post- processing
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3276
Re: How to use the matlab script for pre- &post- processing
Now, I have created several forcing files according to the script of D_ECMWF2ROMS. However, when i generate the initial and boundary files using d_mercator2roms.m and D_OBC_MERCATOR.m, I can not find the source dataset of mercator ocean data. So my problem is how to download the mercator ocean data ...
- Wed Sep 11, 2019 1:22 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: DIAG speed trouble / gridbuilder
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3481
DIAG speed trouble / gridbuilder
Dear all, I'm trying to run ROMs by bulk forcing,and initial condition, but it blows up. Because my area is near the coast and my blow-up point is in the shallow water area(~10m), I try to decrease my dt from 300s to 10s and decrease my N from 36 to 25. It does work but it just delay the time of ...
- Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:33 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: DIAG speed trouble
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3917
DIAG speed trouble
Dear all, I'm trying to run ROMs by bulk forcing, river forcing and boundary values, but it blows up from the beginning. And ROMS doesn't show the details. I wonder that which problems can result in this blow-up, then I can have a check. Thank you! ---------------------------- mab Operating system ...
- Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:55 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: if I can set hc=Tcline>hmin?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6806
Re: if I can set hc=Tcline>hmin?
It depends on which vertical "transform" function you use. The old one needed Tcline <= hmin, but the new one does not. I'm sure there's plenty of code still around from the bad old days. I use: Vtransform == 2 ! transformation equation Vstretching == 4 ! stretching function THETA_S == 7.0d0 ...
- Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:05 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: if I can set hc=Tcline>hmin?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6806
if I can set hc=Tcline>hmin?
Hello everyone,
I found that in init.matlab pre-processing file, people set hc=min(hmin,Tcline), but my hmin is very small(2m), so I want to set a bigger hc=Tcline(50m)(change the code hc=min(hmin,Tcline) to hc=Tcline). I wonder that if it's OK?
Thank you!!
I found that in init.matlab pre-processing file, people set hc=min(hmin,Tcline), but my hmin is very small(2m), so I want to set a bigger hc=Tcline(50m)(change the code hc=min(hmin,Tcline) to hc=Tcline). I wonder that if it's OK?
Thank you!!
- Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:32 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: The xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3273
Re: The xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input
Thank you so much!kate wrote:It refers to i, j. The western-most u-point is at i=1.
- Fri Sep 06, 2019 6:12 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: The xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3273
The xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input
Hello everyone, I have a question about the xi_position and eta_position of rivers.nc input. I wonder the xi_position and eta_position refer to the internal grid or the rho grid(contains two more external columns). If it refers to the rho grid, we can use i and j But if it refers to the internal ...
- Sat Mar 16, 2019 2:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: parameter hc and Tcline
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3014
Re: parameter hc and Tcline
Thank you for your replywilkin wrote:The parameters Tcline and hc are explained here:
https://www.myroms.org/wiki/Vertical_S-coordinate
The page concludes with some example stretching generated with scoord.m which is in the Matlab repository available on myroms.org.
Peida
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 8:48 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Which tool is the stablest tools to create ROMS grid?
- Replies: 56
- Views: 297688
Re: Which tool is the stablest tools to create ROMS grid?
Hi Peida, It sounds like being able to specify exact corner coordinates would be a useful feature to add, I'll try and put something together. In the meantime you can import custom reference points in a text file as comma deliminated x,y pairs. These points will plot as small black + symbols on the ...
- Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:30 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: parameter hc and Tcline
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3014
parameter hc and Tcline
Hi all, I am writing the matlab code to generate init.nc file now. But I am not clear about the physical significance of parameter hc and Tcline . I try to Goole that but I did not find the answer. I would so appreciate if if someone can explain these parameters. Thanks for your attention and your ...
- Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:23 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Which tool is the stablest tools to create ROMS grid?
- Replies: 56
- Views: 297688
Re: Which tool is the stablest tools to create ROMS grid?
Hi Victor, Unfortunately I haven't added support for creating multiple nested grids into GruidBuilder since I've only done off-line nesting. For now you'll have to add the nesting attributes manually to the attributes in the new grid to use contact.m. I'll look into it for the next time I update ...
- Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:35 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14957
Re: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
But, are you only using ROMS why use the COAWST ? I agree with Ivica, if you do not use the functions of a coupled model, it does not make sense to use it. Do you use the tidal forcing and river data? What atmospheric and ocean forcing are you using? On what machine do you perform your simulations ...
- Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:33 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14957
Re: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
I suggest you first to read a few papers related to the wind stress formulations in extreme events like TC, many of them are John's papers using COAWST and many Hurricane cases etc. Not to just blindly run ROMS model and then expect to get result that is perfect. For example: Bryant & Akbar in JMSE ...
- Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:48 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Too strong currents in hurricane-induced flow
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2725
Re: Too strong currents in hurricane-induced flow
Hi hpd14thu, Thanks for your questions. 1) Are the wind speeds also overestimated compared to the data? 2) There has been an observed rolloff of drag at high wind speeds that is not coded into the current version of bulk fluxes. This will be included in the next COAWST version, but you can send me ...
- Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:13 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14957
Re: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
Are you using COAWST or ROMS? Hello, I wonder that the magnitute of the wind speed you used. I also met the problem that the currents were too strong. My wind speed is up tp 58m/s. I don't know that if the scheme in ROMS can adapt to the 58m/s-wind speed, or if there is something wrong in my cpps. ...
- Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: out-of-memory problem in .nc file while pre-process
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3083
Re: out-of-memory problem in .nc file while pre-process
lalvarez wrote:Hello there
You have to look at your files timelength, or how you set the order in your *.in file configuration
Thank you for your reply, the problems are solved!
- Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:00 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Too strong currents in hurricane-induced flow
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2725
Too strong currents in hurricane-induced flow
I use the hurricane to force the upper ocean, and the wind speed is up to 55m/s. And there is a problem, the upper ocean's currents is too strong compared to the data. I wonder that if I have choose some cppoptions when I try the high-speed wind cases?
- Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:34 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14957
Re: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
Hello, I wonder that the magnitute of the wind speed you used.
I also met the problem that the currents were too strong. My wind speed is up tp 58m/s. I don't know that if the scheme in ROMS can adapt to the 58m/s-wind speed, or if there is something wrong in my cpps.
I also met the problem that the currents were too strong. My wind speed is up tp 58m/s. I don't know that if the scheme in ROMS can adapt to the 58m/s-wind speed, or if there is something wrong in my cpps.
- Sun Nov 25, 2018 2:47 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: out-of-memory problem in .nc file while pre-process
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3083
out-of-memory problem in .nc file while pre-process
Hello, I try to generate force.nc file by Matlab, and the variables in this file are Uwind, Vwind, Pair.... But the matrix of variables is too big and Matlab show that 'one or more variables sizes violate format'. So I generate two force.nc, which are corresponding to different period of time. But ...
- Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:55 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: blow-up when lateral gradient increases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2480
Re: blow-up when lateral gradient increases
Thank you for your reply , I set a shorter timestep and the problem was solved.o(∩_∩)okate wrote:Maybe you need a shorter timestep when the winds ramp up. What is the nature of your blow-up?
- Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:03 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: blow-up when lateral gradient increases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2480
blow-up when lateral gradient increases
I set the U-wind and V-wind as input forcing file, when the lateral gradient of these two variales increase, the project blow-up.
So how can I solve this problem if I want to run the high lateral gradient case? Thank you!
So how can I solve this problem if I want to run the high lateral gradient case? Thank you!
- Tue Oct 02, 2018 1:56 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Parameter Theta s and theta b don't work
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2906
Re: Parameter Theta s and theta b don't work
s_rho is not the final dimensional vertical coordinate. s_rho depends on the choice of TRANSFORM and the final z depths depend on the STRETCHING applied to s_rho. Read https://www.myroms.org/wiki/Vertical_S-coordinate There are Matlab and Python routines to compute z offline from the Vtransform ...
- Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:24 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Parameter Theta s and theta b don't work
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2906
Parameter Theta s and theta b don't work
I set theta s=5 and theta b=0.4 , these parameters should work on the spacing of near-surface.
But the value of s_rho shows that the grid is still equidistant.
I wonder how to solve this problems, look forward to your reply.
But the value of s_rho shows that the grid is still equidistant.
I wonder how to solve this problems, look forward to your reply.
- Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:16 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: How to set Coriolis parameter f in x-y coordinates?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2669
Re: How to set Coriolis parameter f in x-y coordinates?
Look at the examples in ana_grid.h (which you are presumably using to create your x/y grid). Follow one of these, like UPWELLING: Xsize=1000.0_r8*REAL(Lm(ng),r8) Esize=1000.0_r8*REAL(Mm(ng),r8) depth=150.0_r8 f0=-8.26E-05_r8 beta=0.0_r8 and set f0 to the value you want. Then there is code later in ...
- Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:47 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: How to set Coriolis parameter f in x-y coordinates?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2669
How to set Coriolis parameter f in x-y coordinates?
Hello, I want to use x-y coordinate instead lat-lon coordinate, but I don't know where can I set the value of parameter f. I wonder that if I should set the value in grid.nc or other place .
Hope your reply.Thanks~
Hope your reply.Thanks~
- Sat May 12, 2018 11:21 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
Hello,here is the part about reading the forcing file in result.out. I wonder that if there is any problems in reading part. I just set one variable : Uwind = 8, all of other values =0 LM: GET_STATE - Read state initial conditions, t = 0 00:00:00 (Grid 01, File: zfirst_init_cco.nc, Rec=0001, Index=1) ...
- Sat May 12, 2018 6:20 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
You probably set all sea grids as land pixels. So all the velocity/kinetic energy are zeros, but total potential energy and volume are not since the calculation of these diagnostics are not masked off. Can you make a plot your land/sea masks to check? -Bin Hello,Bin Thank you for your help and ...
- Fri May 11, 2018 12:22 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Bug when write the values into forcing.ncfile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3543
Re: Bug when write the values into forcing.ncfile
And here is my matlab file which used to write values into forcing.nc file: %1) Enter start time of forcing file, in seconds. % This time needs to be consistent with model time (ie dstart and time_ref). % See *.in files for more detail. time = [0 1 2]; sms_time = [0 1 2]; %4) Obtain grid information ...
- Fri May 11, 2018 11:58 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
Reading the log file output your quoted WRT_HIS - wrote history fields (Index=2,2) into time record = 0000082 82 0 00:00:01 0.000000E+00 9.608405E+01 9.608405E+01 4.601201E ... that says to me the model has run for only 1 second of simulated time. If so, you're not going to see much action. What is ...
- Fri May 11, 2018 11:28 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Bug when write the values into forcing.ncfile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3543
Re: Bug when write the values into forcing.ncfile
And here is my frc_uvstress.cdl netcdf frc_uvstress { dimensions: xi_rho = 100 ; xi_u = 99 ; xi_v = 100 ; eta_rho = 200 ; eta_u = 200 ; eta_v = 199 ; sms_time = UNLIMITED ; // (0 currently) variables: float sms_time(sms_time) ; sms_time:long_name = "surface momentum stress time" ; sms_time:units ...
- Fri May 11, 2018 11:28 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Bug when write the values into forcing.ncfile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3543
Bug when write the values into forcing.ncfile
I'm a beginner at computer programming. I use the frc_uvstress.cdl file in ".../trunk/Data/ROMS/CDL" , and I transfered it into forcing netcdf file. Then I use a matlab file(which named str_cdl_nc.m) to write values(sms time, sustr, svstr) into the ncfile. But when I check the forcing.nc file. The ...
- Fri May 11, 2018 2:44 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9500
Re: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
Dear, Your attached file is completely wrong :shock: and it's not really readable for the ROMS, such attributions, dimensions and time format. I suggest you that follow directory :arrow: ".../trunk/Data/ROMS/CDL" it can help you to find your questions :?: . Good luck to you Farshid Thanks a lot! I ...
- Thu May 10, 2018 4:46 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
To add to Kate's suggestion, I would run this model for about 10 time steps having compiled with debug on in the compile script (however you compile the model). Run in scalar mode (one processor). Make sure that you turn on array bounds checking. This makes sure that arrays are defined and indexes ...
- Thu May 10, 2018 2:34 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9500
Re: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
Dear, As stated by Katherine and John, such errors :arrow: (GET_2DFLD - error while reading variable: or GET_3DFLD - error while reading variable:) are due to the definition of input variables. To avoid encountering such a problem is essential check consistency of the variables in ".nc" file with ...
- Thu May 10, 2018 2:25 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9500
Re: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
Gridded: LonMin = -13.6075 LonMax = 35.9397 LatMin = 97.6335 LatMax = 146.0208 Model: LonMin = 0.0000 LonMax = 0.0000 LatMin = 0.0000 LatMax = 0.0000 Your model grid doesn't appear to have lat,lon values in it. The gridded forcing does have them, though one might question your latitude values. Are ...
- Thu May 10, 2018 1:36 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
Given the values in the wind forcing file (10^34), I think these are all "missing values" for netcdf. Are you sure that you assigned variables to the forcing file? I would plot the wind speeds in the forcing file to see that they are what you wanted. If the forcing file is ok, then make sure that ...
- Sun May 06, 2018 5:23 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9500
Re: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
Gridded: LonMin = -13.6075 LonMax = 35.9397 LatMin = 97.6335 LatMax = 146.0208 Model: LonMin = 0.0000 LonMax = 0.0000 LatMin = 0.0000 LatMax = 0.0000 your forcing file does not have any grid data. each field needs an attribute of lon and lat. see here https://www.myroms.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1 ...
- Sun May 06, 2018 5:02 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9500
Re: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
you basically have this set: /* Forcing */ # ifdef WRF_MODEL ... # else /*# define BULK_FLUXES/* # define ANA_SMFLUX # endif so you have ana_smflux on. that will look for analytical values and they are most likely set to 0. so you would want to use #undef ANA_SMFLUX and then it will look for su ...
- Sun May 06, 2018 4:55 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
kate wrote:I don't know what to check either, but you need to be looking at the values in all the input and output files. Where is that weird 1e34 coming from? I like ncview for viewing these files.
- Sun May 06, 2018 3:07 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: sustr and svstr Value has not been read
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9500
sustr and svstr Value has not been read
My force file contains sustr and svstr , but when I run it , I find that these two variable has not been read. I consider that there are some problems in my head file , but I don't know which CPP option I should add into head file. Here is my head file: /* ** svn $Id: sandy.h 25 2007-04-09 23:43:58Z ...
- Sun May 06, 2018 6:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
【and when I checked the calculation process in his file , I found that the sus ,the svs..in each step is 10^34, I don't know if it means that the calculation is blow out.】 It means you have some serious problems. I'm not sure what, but I'd look carefully at all the inputs and outputs. And here is my ...
- Sun May 06, 2018 5:52 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
Here is the file which used to generae force.nc : %1) Enter name of netcdf forcing file to be created. % If it already exists it will be overwritten!!. % fn='zfirst_wind_cco.nc'; fn='zfirst_wind_cco.nc'; %2) If you want to read the forcing data from another netcdf file, then % enter read_forcing=1 ...
- Sun May 06, 2018 5:43 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
【and when I checked the calculation process in his file , I found that the sus ,the svs..in each step is 10^34, I don't know if it means that the calculation is blow out.】 It means you have some serious problems. I'm not sure what, but I'd look carefully at all the inputs and outputs. Thank you for ...
- Sat May 05, 2018 3:05 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
The forcing file just contains frc_bulk variables:
Uwind , Vwind , Pair..
But I don't use ustress adn vstress
Uwind , Vwind , Pair..
But I don't use ustress adn vstress
- Sat May 05, 2018 2:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
And here is my result: Lateral Boundary Conditions: NLM ============================ Variable Grid West Edge South Edge East Edge North Edge --------- ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- zeta 1 Closed Closed Closed Closed ubar 1 Closed Closed Closed Closed vbar 1 Closed Closed Closed ...
- Sat May 05, 2018 1:57 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
/* ** svn $Id: sandy.h 25 2007-04-09 23:43:58Z jcwarner $ ******************************************************************************* ** Copyright (c) 2002-2007 The ROMS/TOMS Group ** ** Licensed under a MIT/X style license ** ** See License_ROMS.txt ...
- Sat May 05, 2018 1:57 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
Re: all result = 0?
! Application title. TITLE = ZFIRST ! C-preprocessing Flag. MyAppCPP = ZFIRST ! Input variable information file name. This file needs to be processed ! first so all information arrays can be initialized properly. VARNAME = /home/hpd14/Documents/COAWST_V3.2/ROMS/External/varinfo.dat ! Number of ...
- Sat May 05, 2018 1:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: all result = 0?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 19477
all result = 0?
Hello ,every one,I just use a grid file, a initial file and a easy wind file, in order to calculate the flow forced by the wind. But the result( u,v ,salt...) is zero. I tried a lot ,but it didn't work. I really need your help, thank you!
Here is my in.file and headfile
Here is my in.file and headfile