Hi,
I'm attaching a python script here so it may be of use to others.
Good luck.
Thiago.
Search found 14 matches
- Sat Dec 21, 2019 5:38 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Delft3D grids to NetCDF
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24817
- Thu Dec 19, 2019 2:20 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Delft3D grids to NetCDF
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24817
Re: Delft3D grids to NetCDF
I have recently build a ROMS grid using RGFGRID and QUICKPLOT, from Delft3D's Graphical User Interface (GUI), and pyroms ( https://github.com/ESMG/pyroms ). The main idea is to convert a delft3d grid (.grd) created with RGFGRID into .mat using QUICKPLOT. This will give you the grid vertices in a ...
- Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:12 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: how to improve vertical profile velocity
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6255
Re: how to improve vertical profile velocity
I did try to use TS_A4HADVECTION, TS_A4VADVECTION with UV_ADV and UV_C4ADVECTION but it leads on blowing up within several months of simulations due to a discontinuity on Temperature and Salinity. Is it need a smaller timestep to use Akima horizontal and vertical advection? Or any other things ...
- Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:46 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: how to improve vertical profile velocity
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6255
Re: how to improve vertical profile velocity
I faced a similar issue in my application. The problem occurred only in the slope region where the bathymetry was steeper. My suspicious at the time was that a strong Ekman layer was being formed, inducing a change in velocity direction. So I gradually reduced the bottom drag (if using UV_QDRAG ...
- Thu Dec 27, 2018 12:26 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14959
Re: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
Hi, the BLK_ZW parameter refers to height of your surface wind. Mine is set to 10.0 m as this is the height of the wind momentum components I used to build my forcing files. I used this dataset: "NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) Selected Hourly Time-Series Products, January 1979 to ...
- Mon Dec 24, 2018 2:26 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14959
Re: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
I don't remember the exact steps I took, but the flag WIND_MINUS_CURRENT (see: https://www.myroms.org/projects/src/ticket/758 ) along with a fine tweak in viscosity (nl_visc2) led me to better results. Besides comparing to global models, I also made some comparisons with in situ data (with ...
- Sat Nov 10, 2018 3:14 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn928)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10574
Re: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn
Thank you very much for the reply. You are doing something wrong or something is weird with the compiler. You need to read carefully the following :arrow: trac ticket. Notice that even if SINGLE_PRECISION is activated, there are several variables that are still in double precision (dp 64-bit kind ...
- Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:11 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn928)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10574
Error compiling ROMS with new flag SINGLE_PRECISION (svn928)
Hello all, I'm not sure this is whether a bug or a particular issue with my enviroment or setup. Anyway, I think it's worth to report. I have been running my ROMS IS4DVAR application for a while using revision 881. Now I decided to test the new flag SINGLE_PRECISION of revision 928, which is ...
- Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:37 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Unable to inquire about contents of netCDF in svn881
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2943
Unable to inquire about contents of netCDF in svn881
Hi, I'm running a realistic application spanning 6 years (2008 - 2014) and I was able to execute the entire simulation using ROMS version svn783. However, after upgrading to svn881, I am getting the following error: 44160 2009-01-01 00:00:00.00 2.761819E-03 1.905423E+04 1.905423E+04 6.367074E+15 ...
- Thu Jul 27, 2017 2:19 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Doubts regarding strong surface currents
- Replies: 12
- Views: 14959
Doubts regarding strong surface currents
Hi, I'm running ROMS (svn 836) in a realistic application in southeast of Brazil and I've noticed what appears to be an overestimation of surface currents, possibly due to wind stress. I'am using bulk fluxes and hourly fields from CFSR reanalyses as forcing and 1/12 degree resolution grid nested to ...
- Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:56 am
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4412
Re: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
Update 3: I feel crazy answer my own post several times but this might be useful for others. It is possible to use the 3rd-order upstream split tracer advection scheme (TS_U3ADV_SPLIT) for the nonlinear model with IS4DVAR, or any other option, as explained in here https://www.myroms.org/forum ...
- Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:51 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4412
Re: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
Update 2:
After compiling and trying to run, I found that TS_U3ADV_SPLIT is indeed not supported in adjoint as it is not coded yet.
After compiling and trying to run, I found that TS_U3ADV_SPLIT is indeed not supported in adjoint as it is not coded yet.
- Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:52 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4412
Re: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
Update: I managed to compile by making a minor modification in "ad_t3dmix4_geo.h" from ./ROMS/Adjoint/. I included "USE mod_ncparam" statement in subroutines "ad_t3dmix4" and "ad_t3dmix4_tile" definition so "isTvar" becomes accessible. Cheers. Thiago.
- Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:07 pm
- Forum: ROMS Adjoint
- Topic: Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4412
Error compiling IS4DVAR with TS_U3ADV_SPLIT (TS_DIF4)
I'm trying to compile an IS4DVAR application using TS_U3ADV_SPLIT as tracer advection scheme in NLM but it throws me the following error: ad_t3dmix.f90(268): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [ISTVAR] IF (ad_LBC(iwest,isTvar(itrc),ng)%closed) THEN It seems ...