Hello all,
I followed wilkin's suggestion and created a private ana_nudgcoef.h to configure a spatial distribution of the nudging coefficients for my experiment.
I wonder is there is any way of having the nudging coefficient spatial distribution (matrices) as output, in one of the avg/his/dia/etc ...
Search found 3 matches
- Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:34 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Confusion about Nudging Coefficient
- Replies: 16
- Views: 17439
- Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:47 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: No slip vs. free slip around masked land areas
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9704
Re: No slip vs. free slip around masked land areas
Thank you very much, Kristen and wilkin.
However, I'm still confused.
On my Utility/metrics.F there is the same code comment as Kristen pointed out - so the masked areas would be hard-wired to be no-slip.
But on the link that she posted,
https://www.myroms.org/wiki/index.php/N ... Land_Areas ...
However, I'm still confused.
On my Utility/metrics.F there is the same code comment as Kristen pointed out - so the masked areas would be hard-wired to be no-slip.
But on the link that she posted,
https://www.myroms.org/wiki/index.php/N ... Land_Areas ...
- Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:53 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: No slip vs. free slip around masked land areas
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9704
Re: No slip vs. free slip around masked land areas
I have the exact same issue as Deborah. I have two simulations, being the only difference between them the gamma2 variable in the .in, with values 1 and -1. And the results from both look exactly the same. Should I so something else, besides setting gamma2 to -1, to configure a no-slip simulation?
I ...
I ...