Hi Dr. Fennel,
Thank you so much for the quick reply. Actually I really need your suggestions. Since the region where I will at last configure for 3D coupled model has deepest water depth with only 100m, so at present the experiments I set up by running 1D bio-toy are with different water depth ...
Search found 10 matches
- Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:15 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Questions about bio_fennel simulation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5402
- Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:32 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Questions about bio_fennel simulation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5402
Questions about bio_fennel simulation
Hi all,
This problem has been confused me for a while and I am seeking for help here.
I was trying to configure a coupled 3D physical - fennel biology model for the MAB region, but the surface chlorophyll spatial distribution and the time of bloom always went wrong (comparing with satellite and in ...
This problem has been confused me for a while and I am seeking for help here.
I was trying to configure a coupled 3D physical - fennel biology model for the MAB region, but the surface chlorophyll spatial distribution and the time of bloom always went wrong (comparing with satellite and in ...
- Wed Jun 11, 2014 2:34 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Units and detritus in biological module
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2182
Units and detritus in biological module
Hi all,
I have two very naive questions.
The first one is about the units in ROMS biological module. With NPZD_Powell as an example, every variable (P,Z,D) should be set as nitrogen-based, i.e. millimole_nitrogen meter-3. While in variable.dat, there is also unit millimole meter-3. I am wondering ...
I have two very naive questions.
The first one is about the units in ROMS biological module. With NPZD_Powell as an example, every variable (P,Z,D) should be set as nitrogen-based, i.e. millimole_nitrogen meter-3. While in variable.dat, there is also unit millimole meter-3. I am wondering ...
- Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:33 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Couldn't write average result
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3363
Re: Couldn't write average result
Hi Kate,
Thanks for your reply! I am using ifort compiler system and the version is the newest 3.6 (just updated yesterday).
Actually now the average file could successfully be generated only if I don't defining 2D variables, i.e. ubar, vbar, zeta. That's really bizarre.
Thanks for your reply! I am using ifort compiler system and the version is the newest 3.6 (just updated yesterday).
Actually now the average file could successfully be generated only if I don't defining 2D variables, i.e. ubar, vbar, zeta. That's really bizarre.
- Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:37 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Couldn't write average result
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3363
Couldn't write average result
Hi all,
Today I updated my ROMS version from 3.4 to 3.6, but when I tried to repeat an old case, it seems that with v3.6 I couldn't write out the average files.The log file always stopped at:
STEP Day HH:MM:SS KINETIC_ENRG POTEN_ENRG TOTAL_ENRG NET_VOLUME
C => (i,j,k) Cu Cv Cw Max Speed
0 0 00 ...
Today I updated my ROMS version from 3.4 to 3.6, but when I tried to repeat an old case, it seems that with v3.6 I couldn't write out the average files.The log file always stopped at:
STEP Day HH:MM:SS KINETIC_ENRG POTEN_ENRG TOTAL_ENRG NET_VOLUME
C => (i,j,k) Cu Cv Cw Max Speed
0 0 00 ...
- Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:39 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Error while processing Climatology multi-files:
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11301
Re: Error while processing Climatology multi-files:
Hi, I just want to extend this question more: would it be possible to put several climatological files with different variables? To be more specific, since climatological files require 2D & 3D velocity, temperature, salinity and zeta. However, if the data set is too big to write in one nc file, I am ...
- Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:11 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: ROMS wetting-drying and bulk flux heating/cooling
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9941
Re: ROMS wetting-drying and bulk flux heating/cooling
Yes. I also have the same question. Is there any more detailed instruction for heat flux forcing for ROMS?
Thanks!
Thanks!
- Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:15 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Abnormal SST and unsatisfying heat flux in the model output
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2572
Re: Abnormal SST and unsatisfying heat flux in the model out
Here is the second figure.
- Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:12 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Abnormal SST and unsatisfying heat flux in the model output
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2572
Re: Abnormal SST and unsatisfying heat flux in the model out
Whoops! The figures don't show up. I attach the two figures here. Sorry about that.
- Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:06 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Abnormal SST and unsatisfying heat flux in the model output
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2572
Abnormal SST and unsatisfying heat flux in the model output
Hi all,
I am testing different climatological surface forcing for ROMS in our model domain (Northeast North Atlantic (NENA), focusing on Mid-Atlantic Bight area (MAB) ) but now I get some unrealistic results.
Since ROMS could be forced in two different ways: either by direct surface flux or using ...
I am testing different climatological surface forcing for ROMS in our model domain (Northeast North Atlantic (NENA), focusing on Mid-Atlantic Bight area (MAB) ) but now I get some unrealistic results.
Since ROMS could be forced in two different ways: either by direct surface flux or using ...