Search found 8 matches
- Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:56 pm
- Forum: Job Opportunities
- Topic: Postdoc in Estuarine/Sediment Dynamics at Univ. of Oregon
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3562
Postdoc in Estuarine/Sediment Dynamics at Univ. of Oregon
Please see information below for a postdoc opportunity at the University of Oregon, in Eugene, OR. — Postdoctoral fellowship: Estuarine dynamics / Sediment transport / Numerical modeling Advisor: Dave Sutherland, University of Oregon (http://pages.uoregon.edu/dsuth/) Location: Dept. of Earth S ...
- Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:55 pm
- Forum: Job Opportunities
- Topic: Postdoc Opportunity at University of Oregon
- Replies: 0
- Views: 12155
Postdoc Opportunity at University of Oregon
Please see information below for a postdoc opportunity at the University of Oregon, in Eugene, OR. — Postdoctoral fellowship : Ice-Ocean Interactions / Physical Oceanography / Glaciology Advisor : Dave Sutherland, University of Oregon (http://pages.uoregon.edu/dsuth/) Location : Dept. of Geological S ...
- Fri May 01, 2009 5:59 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: problems after updating to latest revision(321)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5901
Re: problems after updating to latest revision(321)
It's resolved now. In my previous runs, my river forcing file had the variable 'river' (river identification number in varinfo.dat) but never specified values for it. Apparently, this didn't cause a problem in the old code, but did when I got the latest (revision 338). An easy fix- just specify ...
- Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:07 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: problems after updating to latest revision(321)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5901
Re: problems after updating to latest revision(321)
Hi rongzr, I am getting the same problem after updating to revision 338. I run the same code as before (that ran under roms 3.0) and get an error : "GET_CYCLE - starting time for variable: river is greater than current model time. TMIN = *************** TDAYS = 120.0000" Did oyu ever resolve this ...
- Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:49 am
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6549
Re: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
thanks- does this mean I need to fix get_idata.F myself, or just checkout the latest version? I'm running roms 3.2, svn revision 294M, which I got in early Jan.
- Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:07 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6549
Re: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
I finally got this run to make it- thanks for the help Kate. I think the problem was in the defining of the time variables I had in my input netcdf files. One more question though- I can't seem to get rid of those 1.e37 values as min/max for my tidal values, and the weird thing is that for tidal ...
- Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:29 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6549
Re: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
Hi Kate, Thanks for the reply and suggestions. I recompiled with the use_debug flag 'on', in the same configuration as before. When I ran the code this time I got the error: "At line 151 of file get_cycle.f90 Fortran runtime error: Array reference out of bounds for array 'tval', lower bound of ...
- Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:46 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6549
segmentation fault trying to run realistic app
I got ROMS 3 up and running on a Mac OSX 10.5.6 using gfortran (i'm a new user). The upwelling case ran fine. Now I am trying to set up my own application, but I get segmentation faults that happen before the model even starts running (i.e I can 'make'). I have tried cutting down my grid size ...